I had a great time with Maxine Sielman on 1150 KWKY this morning. We talked about all kinds of things regarding Easter, including the news about The Gospel of Judas.
What cracks me up is that the media and those opposed to Christianity readily accept this "gospel" even though it is a copy of a copy of an original that is no longer in existence, but do not really accept the four gospels. The first gospel (Mark) was written within 20-30 years of Jesus' death, while this gospel of Judas was written 100 or more years later. Which would seem more accurate to you? It seems to me that these intellectual elites just love the controversy and opportunity to discredit the historical reality of Jesus.
2 comments:
...or Jesus walked on a sheet of ice, not water, in the Sea of Galilee! It's Isreal! Ok, Northern Isreal, but the "unique freezing process" the "scientists" are referring to, has only happened a few times over the past 12,000 years! What are the odds?
Yet another example of the intellecutal elites discreditting the historical (and documented!) reality of Jesus.
I guess Peter just fell into a hole in the ice and didn't really lose doubt after all.
Post a Comment